Cutting Unplanned Downtime from Bearing Failures: A Manufacturing Plant Case Study
Case studyJanuary 15, 2025

Cutting Unplanned Downtime from Bearing Failures: A Manufacturing Plant Case Study

A plant was losing up to 15 pieces of equipment a year to sudden bearing failures. Ultrasonic routes built on SDT340 found the defects weeks before failure — a KEG TRK case study in Kazakhstan.

Article available in Russian

The full article body is currently published in Russian. A translated version is in progress — switch to Russian for the complete text.

Read in Russian

Client

A large machine-building plant in Kazakhstan that manufactures components for the oil & gas industry.

The problem

  • Up to 15 unplanned shutdowns a year due to bearing failures
  • High emergency repair costs
  • No predictive maintenance program in place

The solution

A comprehensive ultrasonic monitoring program built on SDT340 was deployed:

Equipment

  • 3 sets of SDT340 for different shops
  • UAS3 software for data management
  • Training for a team of 5 specialists

Implementation

  1. Built an equipment database (500+ measurement points)
  2. Trained staff in ultrasonic testing methodology
  3. Launched a regular monitoring program (monthly)
  4. Configured alarm levels and trending

Results

Metric Before After Improvement
Unplanned shutdowns 15/year 3/year 80%
Maintenance cost 100% 65% 35%
Repair time 100 hours 25 hours 75%
ROI 6 months

Key findings

Early defect detection

  • A turbine bearing defect was detected 3 months before failure
  • A lubrication problem was found on 20% of pumps
  • Compressed air leaks were located (savings of $15,000/year)

Best-practice rollout

  • Standardized the bearing lubrication procedure
  • Implemented alarm management
  • Built a reference-value knowledge base

Next steps

  • Expand the program to electrical equipment
  • Deploy LUBExpert to automate lubrication
  • Consider stationary Vigilant monitoring for critical assets

Client testimonial

"SDT340 let us move from reactive to predictive maintenance. Payback was under 6 months." — Chief mechanical engineer, the plant